Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Statement||by D. A. Thomas.|
|Series||Cambridge studies in criminology ;, v. 27|
|LC Classifications||KD8406 .T56 1979|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||li, 410 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||410|
|ISBN 10||0435828819, 0435828827|
|LC Control Number||79315920|
Sentencing is defined as 'the process by which people who have been found guilty of offending against the criminal law have sanctions imposed upon them in accordance with the law' It is this task which is examined in this book. The major change in sentencing in Australia over the past 20 years has been the enactment of provisions to govern the. Sentencing is defined as “the process by which people who have been found guilty of offending against the criminal law have sanctions imposed upon them in accordance with the law” It is this task which is examined in this book. The major change in sentencing in Australia over the past 20 years has been the enactment of provisions to govern Cited by: 4. Sentencing Principles of "limiting" retributivism, in which retributive or "just-deserts" val- ues set upper, and occasionally lower, limits on the nature and severity. sentence, in criminal law, punishment that a court orders, imposed on a person convicted of criminal activity. Sentences typically consist of fines, corporal punishment, imprisonment for varying periods including life, or capital punishment, and sometimes combine two or more the United States, the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution bans "cruel and unusual punishments.
The principle of ‘parity’ (or uniformity, equality) says that similar offences should be punished similarly. For example, if a person is sentenced to 3 years for the crime described above (ie armed robbery + assault + affray), then others who commit the same sort of crime should get roughly the same penalty. These principles include: parsimony – the sentence must be no more severe than is necessary to meet the purposes of sentencing proportionality – the overall punishment must be proportionate to the gravity of the offending behaviour parity – similar sentences should be imposed for similar offences. The Guidelines Manual Annotated (featured below) is an online HTML version of the Guidelines Manual that provides improved access to the history of specific guideline and commentary provisions. Use the icon next to a provision to access a list of related amendments. The list is arranged in chronological order and provides hyperlinks to the full text of the amendments. In Norval Morris's "limiting retributivist" theory of punishment, considerations of "just deserts" set upper and occasionally lower limits on sentencing severity. Other purposes, including general deterrence, considerations of equality, and "parsimony," provide the necessary "fine-tuning." Proponents of just deserts, such as Andrew von Hirsch, give much greater weight to retributive and Cited by:
Principled sentencing Andrew Von Hirsch Snippet view - Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy He is an editor of Law, Probability and Risk, book reviews editor of the Modern Law Review, and is on the editorial board of Evidence and Proof. Bibliographic information. Title: Principled sentencing: Author. In deciding on the type and amount of sentence to impose, the Court will generally consider and balance 4 main sentencing principles: Retribution: the reasoning behind this principle is that the offender must suffer the penalty for the criminal act which he has carried out. 1-Sentence-Summary: Principles holds the set of rules for work and life billionaire investor and CEO of the most successful fund in history, Ray Dalio, has acquired through his year career in finance. Read in: 4 minutes Favorite quote from the author. Taking into account the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act and the Coroners and Justice Act , the book's inter-disciplinary approach places the legislation and guidelines on sentencing in the context of criminological research, statistical trends and theories of by: